| Author |
Message |
|
| pedro750 |
 Posted: Sun Apr 05, 2009 10:46 am |
 |
|
Member
Joined: 16 Jan 2006
Posts: 48
Location: Italy
|
Other improovment:
I puted the alternator on the lane and I worked all the circonference and the angle. Now it work without all the start gear. Result: - 2.2 kg.
 |
|
|
| Back to top |
 
|
| Satanic Mechanic |
| Posted: Sun Apr 05, 2009 5:14 pm |
|
|
Moderator
Joined: 04 Sep 2005
Posts: 309
Location: Munich, Germany
|
Good work! Eliminating the electric starter and the starter wheel helps a lot, weitht wise.
How much did you take off at the diameter? Did you notice any change in the charging characterisics?
Ciao,
Axl |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| pedro750 |
| Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:22 pm |
|
|
Member
Joined: 16 Jan 2006
Posts: 48
Location: Italy
|
Satanic Mechanic wrote: Good work! Eliminating the electric starter and the starter wheel helps a lot, weitht wise.
How much did you take off at the diameter? Did you notice any change in the charging characterisics?
Ciao,
Axl
The diameter is the same, I've only polished the surface.
Non Changes on the charging characteristics.
Pay attention, 2,2 kg was lost only from the alternator so from the shaft... Electric starter are other Kg from the bike, but no so important like the alternator  |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Deer Slayer |
| Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 5:44 am |
|
|
Junior member
Joined: 30 Oct 2007
Posts: 15
Location: Howell Michigan
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
